Talk:Point-and-shoot camera
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Types
[edit]they're two different types of camaras one is an Advanced Photo System and IF YOU FIND THE OTHER PLEASE EDIT. --71.114.50.71 23:33, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- That doesn't make sense, APS is a highly automated 24mm, P&S existed in the 35mm era, with fixed lens/focus 35s, and before that with Kodak Disc System, brownie cameras, etc. Now there's digital P&S. 65.94.77.134 (talk) 09:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
SLRs
[edit]I have an editor! Your edits are very good, Dicklyon.--Caleb Murdock 07:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I guess. I have no idea what you're trying to say. Dicklyon 17:32, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- I was just being humorous. You improved my paragraph. I rarely feel that the changes to my writing are improvements.--Caleb Murdock 00:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.163.252.42 (talk) 06:09, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Market Shares
[edit]Isn't this paragraph kind of silly? Only 1-2 sentences are actually dedicated to talking about market share. It also sounds very sales pitch-y. Remember: this is a wiki, not a Best Buy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.189.52.141 (talk) 05:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- I think it is some interesting information, but since it is not saying the brand shares I believe the title should be renamed. It is not describing market shares, but rather the type of camera (compact or built-in smartphone) used to take photographs. Concerning the second paragraph, I think it should be deleted. Cheers, Zalunardo8 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes and the usage paragraph belongs in the "Types" section. Jim.henderson (talk) 00:56, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- Dear Jim, thank you for your input. I will delete the second paragraph and move the first one to the 'Camera Types' section. Best, Zalunardo8 (talk) 16:35, 11 April 2013 (UTC)